+73.9%
IBM vs CMS
+36.5%
+37.5%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.2% | +0.3% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +0.4% | -0.7% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -3.6% | +3.9% | +1.0% |
| 3M | -21.6% | -1.9% | -19.7% | -21.1% |
| 6M | -4.7% | -11.0% | +6.3% | -2.3% |
| YTD | -19.1% | +0.2% | -19.3% | -19.4% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | -1.3% | -1.2% | -2.6% |
| All | +73.9% | +36.5% | +37.5% | +56.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling