+73.9%
IBM vs CL
+30.5%
+43.5%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.5% | +1.5% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -2.2% | +1.9% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -4.8% | +5.1% | +1.3% |
| 3M | -21.6% | +4.9% | -26.5% | -21.7% |
| 6M | -4.7% | -5.7% | +1.0% | -3.4% |
| YTD | -19.1% | +14.4% | -33.5% | -21.7% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | +8.7% | -11.3% | -4.5% |
| All | +73.9% | +30.5% | +43.5% | +70.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling