-18.7%
IBM vs CFG
+28.5%
-47.2%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.4% | +0.5% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +0.7% | -2.2% | -1.8% |
| 30D | +8.4% | +2.8% | +5.6% | +7.2% |
| 3M | +4.2% | -10.1% | +14.3% | +8.4% |
| 6M | +7.9% | +3.2% | +4.7% | +6.3% |
| YTD | -15.2% | +14.2% | -29.4% | -18.8% |
| 1Y | -18.7% | +27.4% | -46.1% | -26.2% |
| All | -18.7% | +28.5% | -47.2% | -26.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling