+80.4%
IBM vs BHP
+55.3%
+25.1%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.9% | +0.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +2.5% | -2.8% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +6.8% | -5.2% | +12.0% | +7.5% |
| 3M | +4.4% | -8.7% | +13.1% | +5.6% |
| 6M | +13.2% | -6.9% | +20.0% | +14.3% |
| YTD | -15.1% | +39.0% | -54.1% | -22.0% |
| 1Y | -20.2% | +48.9% | -69.1% | -28.0% |
| All | +80.4% | +55.3% | +25.1% | +56.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling