+73.9%
IBM vs APH
+282.8%
-208.9%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | APH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.9% | -0.8% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +5.0% | -5.3% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -3.9% | +4.2% | +0.7% |
| 3M | -21.6% | +13.0% | -34.6% | -23.6% |
| 6M | -4.7% | +25.2% | -29.8% | -9.3% |
| YTD | -19.1% | +22.9% | -42.0% | -23.5% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | +47.8% | -50.3% | -11.9% |
| All | +73.9% | +282.8% | -208.9% | +9.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling