+4.8%
IBM vs ALHC
-44.5%
+49.3%
-11.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | +0.3% | +1.2% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -5.5% | +3.8% | -1.4% |
| 30D | +10.1% | -4.9% | +15.0% | +10.4% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -41.7% | +46.6% | +5.2% |
| All | +4.8% | -44.5% | +49.3% | +5.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling