+148.1%
IBM vs ABCL
-81.3%
+229.4%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.2% | +1.3% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +0.7% | -1.0% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +93.1% | -92.8% | -3.8% |
| 3M | -21.6% | +79.4% | -101.0% | -24.8% |
| 6M | -4.7% | +214.9% | -219.6% | -11.5% |
| YTD | -19.1% | +234.2% | -253.3% | -25.3% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | +174.8% | -177.3% | -9.4% |
| 3Y | +74.2% | +104.5% | -30.3% | +59.6% |
| 5Y | +113.1% | -39.0% | +152.1% | +94.6% |
| All | +148.1% | -81.3% | +229.4% | +130.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling