+293.0%
IBKR vs ZETA
+269.4%
+23.6%
-38.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | -1.2% | +3.4% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -3.7% | +2.4% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -0.2% | +5.7% | -5.9% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +3.0% | +50.4% | -47.5% | -4.4% |
| 6M | +33.9% | +65.5% | -31.6% | +21.5% |
| YTD | +42.5% | +48.3% | -5.8% | +30.8% |
| 1Y | +44.9% | +45.4% | -0.5% | +32.6% |
| 3Y | +293.0% | +270.8% | +22.2% | +254.9% |
| All | +293.0% | +269.4% | +23.6% | +254.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling