+44.9%
IBKR vs NIO
-36.7%
+81.6%
-18.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | +3.1% | -0.9% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -2.9% | +1.5% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -18.7% | +18.5% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +3.0% | -29.4% | +32.4% | +9.9% |
| 6M | +33.9% | -32.5% | +66.4% | +42.9% |
| YTD | +42.5% | -27.6% | +70.2% | +49.7% |
| 1Y | +44.9% | -39.2% | +84.1% | +65.1% |
| All | +44.9% | -36.7% | +81.6% | +65.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling