+293.0%
IBKR vs DXCM
-20.4%
+313.4%
-38.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DXCM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | -1.8% | +3.9% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -5.5% | +4.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -8.6% | +8.3% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +3.0% | +10.3% | -7.4% | +1.2% |
| 6M | +33.9% | +25.2% | +8.6% | +28.9% |
| YTD | +42.5% | +25.1% | +17.4% | +37.4% |
| 1Y | +44.9% | +9.2% | +35.6% | +41.6% |
| 3Y | +293.0% | -22.6% | +315.6% | +287.3% |
| All | +293.0% | -20.4% | +313.4% | +287.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DXCM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DXCM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DXCM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DXCM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling