+69.8%
IBIT vs UMC
+195.8%
-126.0%
-53.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | +4.6% | -7.0% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +5.0% | -1.9% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +23.1% | +7.7% | +15.4% | +21.6% |
| 3M | +25.6% | +1.7% | +23.9% | +23.1% |
| 6M | +9.1% | +113.9% | -104.8% | -7.1% |
| YTD | -8.9% | +168.9% | -177.8% | -27.5% |
| 1Y | -27.5% | +207.2% | -234.7% | -44.4% |
| All | +69.8% | +195.8% | -126.0% | +26.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling