+58.9%
IBIT vs TRGP
+247.2%
-188.2%
-53.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | +3.4% | -4.7% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -7.2% | +4.8% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -9.1% | -4.2% | -4.9% | -8.5% |
| 3M | +15.0% | +7.0% | +8.0% | +12.6% |
| 6M | -6.9% | +11.2% | -18.1% | -10.5% |
| YTD | -14.8% | +51.1% | -65.9% | -25.7% |
| 1Y | -28.1% | +62.0% | -90.2% | -38.8% |
| All | +58.9% | +247.2% | -188.2% | +7.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling