+69.8%
IBIT vs TRGP
+266.5%
-196.7%
-53.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -1.2% | -1.2% | -2.2% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +0.8% | +2.3% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +23.1% | +11.5% | +11.6% | +19.9% |
| 3M | +25.6% | +9.0% | +16.6% | +22.4% |
| 6M | +9.1% | +20.5% | -11.4% | +2.9% |
| YTD | -8.9% | +59.5% | -68.4% | -21.3% |
| 1Y | -27.5% | +77.9% | -105.4% | -39.8% |
| All | +69.8% | +266.5% | -196.7% | +14.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling