+69.8%
IBIT vs NTRA
+417.5%
-347.6%
-53.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NTRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | +0.2% | -2.6% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +23.1% | +19.5% | +3.6% | +17.6% |
| 3M | +25.6% | +47.8% | -22.2% | +13.0% |
| 6M | +9.1% | +61.6% | -52.5% | -5.3% |
| YTD | -8.9% | +43.3% | -52.2% | -18.4% |
| 1Y | -27.5% | +97.0% | -124.5% | -40.8% |
| All | +69.8% | +417.5% | -347.6% | -3.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling