+66.3%
IBIT vs NTR
+64.2%
+2.1%
-53.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | 0.0% | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +0.5% | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| 30D | +22.2% | +21.7% | +0.5% | +18.2% |
| 3M | +26.0% | +22.8% | +3.3% | +21.4% |
| 6M | +13.2% | +8.2% | +5.0% | +10.9% |
| YTD | -10.8% | +32.9% | -43.7% | -16.8% |
| 1Y | -29.9% | +45.3% | -75.3% | -36.1% |
| All | +66.3% | +64.2% | +2.1% | +41.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling