+70.2%
IBIT vs GLDM
+99.8%
-29.5%
-53.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +3.7% | -0.8% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -0.3% | -1.5% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -6.7% | -1.9% | -4.8% | -5.9% |
| 3M | +24.6% | -0.4% | +25.0% | +25.2% |
| 6M | -0.2% | -10.1% | +9.9% | +3.7% |
| YTD | -8.7% | -5.8% | -2.9% | -6.1% |
| 1Y | -20.7% | +3.1% | -23.8% | -20.2% |
| All | +70.2% | +99.8% | -29.5% | +32.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling