+69.8%
IBIT vs ACGL
+33.5%
+36.3%
-53.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -1.7% | -0.7% | -2.3% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -0.7% | +3.8% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +23.1% | -1.0% | +24.1% | +23.2% |
| 3M | +25.6% | +11.0% | +14.5% | +24.7% |
| 6M | +9.1% | -0.3% | +9.5% | +9.1% |
| YTD | -8.9% | +2.3% | -11.2% | -9.4% |
| 1Y | -27.5% | +6.4% | -33.8% | -28.5% |
| All | +69.8% | +33.5% | +36.3% | +62.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling