+59.7%
HWM vs GLXY
+12.0%
+47.7%
-16.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -0.6% | +0.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +13.4% | -15.5% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -11.0% | +38.1% | -49.1% | -13.4% |
| 3M | +4.0% | -7.3% | +11.4% | +3.9% |
| 6M | -0.2% | +8.2% | -8.4% | -2.1% |
| YTD | +26.7% | +17.8% | +8.9% | +22.3% |
| 1Y | +44.7% | +14.9% | +29.8% | +43.1% |
| All | +59.7% | +12.0% | +47.7% | +58.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling