+690.9%
HWM vs FLNC
-67.0%
+757.9%
-20.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -10.7% | +6.7% | -17.4% | -11.2% |
| 7D | -9.2% | +6.0% | -15.1% | -9.7% |
| 30D | -17.9% | -16.3% | -1.5% | -16.8% |
| 3M | -6.0% | -54.1% | +48.1% | -0.5% |
| 6M | -7.4% | -25.3% | +18.0% | -8.1% |
| YTD | +13.1% | -44.2% | +57.3% | +13.6% |
| 1Y | +29.3% | +53.1% | -23.8% | +15.4% |
| 3Y | +389.9% | -58.3% | +448.2% | +358.6% |
| All | +690.9% | -67.0% | +757.9% | +584.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling