+442.4%
HWM vs BIIB
-16.1%
+458.5%
-19.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.6% | +1.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +1.1% | -3.2% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -11.0% | +6.9% | -17.9% | -11.3% |
| 3M | +4.0% | +12.4% | -8.4% | +3.2% |
| 6M | -0.2% | +16.3% | -16.5% | -1.3% |
| YTD | +26.7% | +25.5% | +1.2% | +24.9% |
| 1Y | +44.7% | +57.8% | -13.1% | +41.7% |
| All | +442.4% | -16.1% | +458.5% | +436.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling