+792.3%
HUT vs ZETA
+281.1%
+511.2%
-65.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.4% | -1.8% | +8.1% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +28.3% | -2.4% | +30.7% | +29.0% |
| 30D | +12.3% | +15.6% | -3.3% | +6.5% |
| 3M | -16.8% | +41.5% | -58.3% | -27.7% |
| 6M | +111.4% | +63.4% | +47.9% | +71.8% |
| YTD | +116.6% | +51.3% | +65.3% | +79.3% |
| 1Y | +290.5% | +65.8% | +224.7% | +211.8% |
| 3Y | +792.3% | +279.2% | +513.1% | +356.4% |
| All | +792.3% | +281.1% | +511.2% | +356.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling