+359.8%
HUT vs ZETA
+273.0%
+86.9%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +14.6% | +5.3% | +9.3% | +12.9% |
| 7D | -11.4% | -0.4% | -10.9% | -11.2% |
| 30D | -41.0% | -8.0% | -33.0% | -39.2% |
| 3M | -41.9% | +21.4% | -63.3% | -45.8% |
| 6M | -51.7% | +80.1% | -131.8% | -62.0% |
| YTD | +14.6% | +52.5% | -37.9% | -5.7% |
| 1Y | +21.4% | +58.5% | -37.1% | -1.2% |
| 3Y | +359.8% | +281.7% | +78.2% | +96.2% |
| All | +359.8% | +273.0% | +86.9% | +96.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling