+501.6%
HUT vs TRGP
+267.3%
+234.3%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.6% | +3.7% | +3.8% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +24.8% | +2.4% | +22.4% | +22.9% |
| 30D | -28.4% | +0.8% | -29.2% | -28.4% |
| 3M | -31.2% | +10.4% | -41.6% | -35.7% |
| 6M | -40.2% | +16.3% | -56.5% | -47.1% |
| YTD | +32.9% | +61.1% | -28.2% | -13.1% |
| 1Y | +39.1% | +71.6% | -32.6% | -13.0% |
| All | +501.6% | +267.3% | +234.3% | +114.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling