+207.4%
HUT vs GLXY
-41.9%
+249.2%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +14.6% | +5.2% | +9.3% | +10.6% |
| 7D | -11.4% | -14.6% | +3.3% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -41.0% | -36.2% | -4.9% | -16.1% |
| 3M | -41.9% | -30.1% | -11.8% | -22.9% |
| 6M | -51.7% | -56.1% | +4.4% | -12.3% |
| YTD | +14.6% | -38.9% | +53.5% | +54.8% |
| 1Y | +21.4% | -55.0% | +76.4% | +104.5% |
| All | +207.4% | -41.9% | +249.2% | +340.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling