+261.8%
HUT vs GLXY
-35.4%
+297.2%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -4.9% | +6.4% | +5.3% |
| 7D | +34.9% | +16.9% | +17.9% | +19.5% |
| 30D | -25.9% | -23.0% | -2.9% | -9.1% |
| 3M | -31.7% | -28.0% | -3.7% | -12.0% |
| 6M | -42.2% | -51.6% | +9.4% | -3.2% |
| YTD | +34.9% | -32.1% | +67.0% | +67.2% |
| 1Y | +48.5% | -51.5% | +100.0% | +134.0% |
| All | +261.8% | -35.4% | +297.2% | +375.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling