+821.5%
HUT vs FLNC
-62.9%
+884.3%
-65.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.8% | +2.5% | +6.4% | +8.0% |
| 7D | +5.4% | -4.1% | +9.5% | +6.9% |
| 30D | +8.6% | -24.8% | +33.4% | +19.2% |
| 3M | -15.2% | -59.1% | +43.9% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +92.9% | -42.0% | +134.8% | +108.2% |
| YTD | +114.6% | -49.8% | +164.4% | +141.1% |
| 1Y | +208.5% | +43.1% | +165.4% | +145.4% |
| 3Y | +821.5% | -61.0% | +882.4% | +884.9% |
| All | +821.5% | -62.9% | +884.3% | +884.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling