+1,077.4%
HUT vs BTSG
+421.3%
+656.1%
-64.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.4% | +3.0% | +3.3% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +28.3% | +5.7% | +22.5% | +24.4% |
| 30D | +12.3% | +0.2% | +12.1% | +11.7% |
| 3M | -16.8% | +5.6% | -22.5% | -21.3% |
| 6M | +111.4% | +50.8% | +60.6% | +62.5% |
| YTD | +116.6% | +67.0% | +49.5% | +56.7% |
| 1Y | +290.5% | +145.5% | +144.9% | +131.0% |
| All | +1,077.4% | +421.3% | +656.1% | +349.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling