+717.0%
HUT vs BLDR
-53.1%
+770.1%
-65.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +2.5% | +3.7% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -2.8% | +20.6% | +19.6% |
| 30D | +0.8% | -13.3% | +14.1% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -26.8% | -12.3% | -14.5% | -24.0% |
| 6M | +72.6% | -31.5% | +104.0% | +105.9% |
| YTD | +103.6% | -36.1% | +139.7% | +150.3% |
| 1Y | +265.3% | -54.1% | +319.3% | +424.0% |
| All | +717.0% | -53.1% | +770.1% | +1,112.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling