+717.0%
HUT vs AMC
-67.9%
+784.9%
-65.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +4.3% | +1.9% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +17.8% | +2.3% | +15.5% | +17.2% |
| 30D | +0.8% | -0.7% | +1.6% | +0.7% |
| 3M | -26.8% | +35.2% | -62.0% | -32.7% |
| 6M | +72.6% | +124.6% | -52.0% | +42.6% |
| YTD | +103.6% | +69.9% | +33.8% | +75.7% |
| 1Y | +265.3% | -2.6% | +267.8% | +246.2% |
| All | +717.0% | -67.9% | +784.9% | +785.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling