+92.6%
HUM vs NIO
-55.0%
+147.5%
-42.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -4.9% | +6.3% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -14.5% | +18.2% | +4.5% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -15.0% | +20.5% | +6.2% |
| 3M | +17.1% | -35.6% | +52.7% | +18.2% |
| 6M | +48.3% | -55.7% | +103.9% | +49.5% |
| YTD | +77.4% | -43.1% | +120.5% | +79.9% |
| 1Y | +92.6% | -53.5% | +146.1% | +98.4% |
| All | +92.6% | -55.0% | +147.5% | +98.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling