-57.6%
HUBS vs EPAM
-57.0%
-0.5%
-79.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | -0.5% | -3.7% | -4.0% |
| 7D | -6.2% | -2.2% | -4.1% | -5.0% |
| 30D | +6.6% | +17.8% | -11.2% | -2.3% |
| 3M | +16.4% | +19.9% | -3.5% | +6.7% |
| 6M | -19.7% | -21.6% | +1.8% | -10.3% |
| YTD | -42.6% | -44.0% | +1.4% | -26.7% |
| 1Y | -54.2% | -30.5% | -23.7% | -46.7% |
| All | -57.6% | -57.0% | -0.5% | -44.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling