-86.5%
HTZ vs XPO
+155.9%
-242.4%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XPO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +4.5% | -3.2% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +2.4% | +5.1% | +6.4% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -3.5% | +51.0% | +49.6% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -11.9% | -43.0% | -52.7% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -10.0% | -37.0% | -45.0% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +42.1% | -97.3% | -61.2% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +47.6% | -105.2% | -63.9% |
| All | -86.5% | +155.9% | -242.4% | -90.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XPO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XPO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XPO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XPO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling