-47.0%
HTZ vs URA
-11.5%
-35.5%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | URA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.5% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +1.1% | +6.4% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +7.4% | +40.0% | +40.9% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -8.4% | -46.5% | -53.6% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -12.7% | -34.3% | -42.5% |
| All | -47.0% | -11.5% | -35.5% | -42.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside URA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus URA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × URA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded URA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling