-54.9%
HTZ vs UMAC
-15.1%
-39.8%
-71.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -3.1% | +4.4% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -0.9% | +8.4% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -7.7% | +55.1% | +45.7% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -26.4% | -28.5% | -54.1% |
| All | -54.9% | -15.1% | -39.8% | -54.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling