-57.6%
HTZ vs UMAC
+164.0%
-221.6%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -3.1% | +4.4% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -0.9% | +8.4% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -7.7% | +55.1% | +47.2% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -26.4% | -28.5% | -54.9% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +61.9% | -108.9% | -50.5% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +86.5% | -141.8% | -59.1% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +156.3% | -214.0% | -62.3% |
| All | -57.6% | +164.0% | -221.6% | -62.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling