-47.0%
HTZ vs TXT
-20.2%
-26.8%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.4% | +1.7% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -4.8% | +12.3% | +11.7% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -10.6% | +58.1% | +62.5% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -13.2% | -41.7% | -48.5% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -20.3% | -26.7% | -27.4% |
| All | -47.0% | -20.2% | -26.8% | -27.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling