-47.0%
HTZ vs TXG
+177.1%
-224.1%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TXG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.9% | +2.2% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +1.8% | +5.7% | +7.2% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +32.0% | +15.4% | +40.6% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +87.0% | -141.9% | -59.0% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +180.1% | -227.1% | -59.5% |
| All | -47.0% | +177.1% | -224.1% | -59.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling