-47.0%
HTZ vs TSLQ
-10.8%
-36.2%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TSLQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +12.0% | -10.7% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -5.8% | +13.3% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -22.1% | +69.5% | +42.9% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +10.1% | -65.0% | -51.6% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -6.8% | -40.2% | -39.6% |
| All | -47.0% | -10.8% | -36.2% | -39.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TSLQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TSLQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TSLQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TSLQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling