-80.2%
HTZ vs TRGP
+227.6%
-307.8%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -4.6% | -16.2% | -19.2% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -12.6% | +4.9% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -4.5% | -8.6% | -12.2% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +4.9% | +9.8% | +10.8% |
| 6M | -70.6% | +5.6% | -76.2% | -72.1% |
| YTD | -65.2% | +50.1% | -115.3% | -72.2% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | +70.2% | -143.4% | -80.0% |
| All | -80.2% | +227.6% | -307.8% | -90.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling