-74.9%
HTZ vs TRGP
+243.5%
-318.5%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | -4.5% | +13.7% | +10.6% |
| 7D | +18.9% | -6.5% | +25.4% | +21.1% |
| 30D | +26.3% | -0.4% | +26.7% | +25.3% |
| 3M | +49.7% | +8.8% | +40.9% | +42.4% |
| 6M | -61.1% | +11.0% | -72.1% | -63.8% |
| YTD | -56.0% | +57.4% | -113.4% | -65.6% |
| 1Y | -66.4% | +87.9% | -154.3% | -76.2% |
| All | -74.9% | +243.5% | -318.5% | -88.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling