-57.6%
HTZ vs TRGP
+80.7%
-138.3%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.2% | +2.5% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +0.8% | +6.7% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +11.5% | +35.9% | +47.7% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +9.0% | -63.9% | -55.0% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +20.5% | -67.5% | -47.2% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +59.5% | -114.8% | -54.7% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +77.9% | -135.6% | -53.8% |
| All | -57.6% | +80.7% | -138.3% | -53.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling