-90.5%
HTZ vs TPG
+92.2%
-182.7%
-93.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | TPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.1% | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.4% | +9.9% | +8.8% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +11.1% | +36.4% | +38.5% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +26.3% | -81.2% | -60.5% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +18.3% | -65.4% | -52.3% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -14.4% | -40.8% | -52.4% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -6.7% | -50.9% | -57.4% |
| 3Y | -86.6% | +111.5% | -198.1% | -91.9% |
| All | -90.5% | +92.2% | -182.7% | -94.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling