-47.0%
HTZ vs TCOM
-20.4%
-26.6%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TCOM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.9% | +2.2% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -9.5% | +17.0% | +9.4% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -10.7% | +58.2% | +49.9% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -14.6% | -40.3% | -52.9% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -19.3% | -27.7% | -38.2% |
| All | -47.0% | -20.4% | -26.6% | -38.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TCOM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TCOM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TCOM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TCOM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling