-74.9%
HTZ vs STLA
-72.7%
-2.2%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +3.8% | +5.4% | +7.7% |
| 7D | +18.9% | -0.6% | +19.6% | +19.1% |
| 30D | +26.3% | +3.6% | +22.7% | +23.9% |
| 3M | +49.7% | -20.6% | +70.3% | +62.4% |
| 6M | -61.1% | -34.3% | -26.8% | -54.3% |
| YTD | -56.0% | -57.3% | +1.3% | -39.7% |
| 1Y | -66.4% | -52.6% | -13.8% | -56.4% |
| All | -74.9% | -72.7% | -2.2% | -61.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling