-80.2%
HTZ vs SCHG
+77.3%
-157.4%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -5.5% | -15.3% | -16.8% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -6.8% | -0.9% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -11.2% | -2.0% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -7.4% | +22.1% | +22.2% |
| 6M | -70.6% | -1.0% | -69.6% | -70.0% |
| YTD | -65.2% | +0.9% | -66.1% | -64.9% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | -0.2% | -73.0% | -72.8% |
| All | -80.2% | +77.3% | -157.4% | -87.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling