-86.5%
HTZ vs RGEN
-3.7%
-82.8%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.2% | +2.5% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -4.9% | +12.4% | +9.2% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +5.7% | +41.8% | +44.8% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +32.4% | -87.3% | -60.2% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +33.2% | -80.2% | -53.5% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +2.3% | -57.5% | -56.6% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +39.0% | -96.6% | -63.8% |
| All | -86.5% | -3.7% | -82.8% | -86.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling