-80.2%
HTZ vs RCAT
+270.1%
-350.3%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RCAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -14.9% | -5.9% | -19.5% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -32.6% | +24.8% | -4.5% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -46.3% | +33.2% | -8.4% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -60.7% | +75.4% | +23.9% |
| 6M | -70.6% | -67.4% | -3.3% | -68.0% |
| YTD | -65.2% | -57.1% | -8.1% | -63.6% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | -63.8% | -9.4% | -71.7% |
| All | -80.2% | +270.1% | -350.3% | -82.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RCAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RCAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RCAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RCAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling