-86.5%
HTZ vs QID
-73.9%
-12.7%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | QID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.4% | +1.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -0.6% | +8.1% | +7.3% |
| 30D | +47.4% | 0.0% | +47.4% | +47.5% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +3.7% | -58.6% | -53.6% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -29.9% | -17.2% | -52.2% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -28.8% | -26.5% | -59.2% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -37.2% | -20.5% | -63.1% |
| All | -86.5% | -73.9% | -12.7% | -91.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling