-48.2%
HTZ vs PLTU
+154.0%
-202.2%
-82.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -9.0% | +10.3% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -13.6% | +21.1% | +8.2% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +16.7% | +30.8% | +45.3% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +29.6% | -84.5% | -56.4% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -0.1% | -46.9% | -48.4% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -31.5% | -23.7% | -55.6% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -19.7% | -37.9% | -59.6% |
| All | -48.2% | +154.0% | -202.2% | -62.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling