-86.5%
HTZ vs NTNX
+96.0%
-182.6%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -1.6% | +9.1% | +7.6% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +11.6% | +35.8% | +46.0% |
| 3M | -54.9% | +23.8% | -78.7% | -55.8% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +68.8% | -115.8% | -49.9% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +31.7% | -86.9% | -56.6% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -0.9% | -56.8% | -57.6% |
| All | -86.5% | +96.0% | -182.6% | -88.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling