-91.5%
HTZ vs NBIX
+59.9%
-151.4%
-95.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.7% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +1.0% | +6.5% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -3.6% | +51.1% | +48.8% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -7.0% | -47.9% | -54.4% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +16.6% | -63.6% | -50.6% |
| YTD | -55.3% | +9.7% | -65.0% | -57.6% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | +10.9% | -68.5% | -60.2% |
| 3Y | -86.6% | +40.7% | -127.3% | -89.0% |
| 5Y | -86.1% | +62.3% | -148.5% | -89.5% |
| All | -91.5% | +59.9% | -151.4% | -93.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling