-47.0%
HTZ vs MULL
+290.4%
-337.4%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +11.8% | -10.5% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +17.3% | -9.8% | +6.3% |
| 30D | +47.4% | +23.5% | +23.9% | +44.9% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -24.0% | -30.9% | -55.4% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +276.7% | -323.7% | -56.0% |
| All | -47.0% | +290.4% | -337.4% | -56.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling