-70.6%
HTZ vs MKC
+6.6%
-77.2%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | MKC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -0.8% | -20.0% | -21.0% |
| 7D | -7.7% | +7.0% | -14.7% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -13.1% | +11.4% | -24.5% | -9.4% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -3.7% | +18.4% | +10.8% |
| 6M | -70.6% | +5.3% | -75.9% | -70.3% |
| All | -70.6% | +6.6% | -77.2% | -70.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MKC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MKC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MKC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MKC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling