-70.6%
HTZ vs LPLA
-6.0%
-64.6%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -3.4% | -17.4% | -19.0% |
| 7D | -7.7% | +7.6% | -15.4% | -9.9% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -9.5% | -3.6% | -9.1% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -16.3% | +31.1% | +25.1% |
| 6M | -70.6% | -8.0% | -62.6% | -71.3% |
| All | -70.6% | -6.0% | -64.6% | -71.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling